Bostik North Programme Ratings

[Scoop]

Aveley fans tv blogspot on Twitter rates Basildon Utd as best programme together with Bury and Canvey we are 7th behind Aveley who are 6th!!

[Deleted]

That is an outrage.

I would be tempted to boycott anything to do with Aveley FC because of their fans behaviour.
But considering the circumstances,that they have been very nice to share their grounds with us,during our period of need,I shall forgive them instead.

[dcjarvis]

Here’s the link aveleyfcfanstv.blogspot.com/2019/05/matchday-programme-review-201819.html

The comments against each programme are pretty good but I think the scoring system is somewhat out of whack.

“Value for money” means the benefit you get rather than the price you pay. It seems Basildon giving their programme away means they win. But there’s no accounting for quality!

[dcjarvis]

I’d need a maths geek (maybe Forever Blue!!) to look at all the data and make a fair scoring system that doesn’t adversely make price or the number of ads a deciding factor.

Ads can be good. Articles can be awful. Saying how many there are doesn’t always make for a good programme.

And I’d have a score for a good front cover. Look at Clapton FC for amazing examples of this

[Deleted]

May 11, 2019 9:41:20 GMT 1 dcjarvis said:

The comments against each programme are pretty good but I think the scoring system is somewhat out of whack.

Yes.

The Grays Ath programme ultimately fails to win for two reason's:
Firstly,because of being penalised for having more adverts (% wise) than nearly every other programme.
Even though the Grays Ath Programme is mostly twice the size of every other programme.
Secondly,for not being in colour throughout.

I realise its all about opinions,but surely the quality of the articles is more important than how many adverts run alongside them,or whether its in colour or not.
Articles = brain work
Getting enough sponsor's to fill 33 pages = brain work
The scoring system penalises intelligence.

Fair play for the people at Aveley FC Fans TV for giving it a go,but they appreciate different things in a programme than I do.

My message to the programme crew ''Keep doing what you're doing,its great''.

[ForeverBlue]

Following your very welcome words of support and with the help of the programme team, I'm sure we will do our best to give everyone a good read at our home games and perhaps for a day or two after.

We've had a discussion about price and despite protestations, we will keep it at £2 a copy, subject to making sure we are making a reasonable profit to support the survival of our club.

I don't think a mathematical model is appropriate to determine the value of a work or art, but thank you Jarvis Jnr for the suggestion! LOL

[dcjarvis]

May 11, 2019 14:26:27 GMT 1 ForeverBlue said:

but thank you Jarvis Jnr

When I reach half a century I wonder if this tag will still be appropriate!

[ForeverBlue]

May 11, 2019 20:59:14 GMT 1 dcjarvis said:

May 11, 2019 14:26:27 GMT 1 ForeverBlue said:

but thank you Jarvis Jnr

When I reach half a century I wonder if this tag will still be appropriate!

At that point it depends on where your poor old man is!

[davidraven]

Sorry, but that is nothing but utter garbage. Quality can only come from original material, not the paper it is printed on or the way it is presented. Even for a subjective view it is severely skewed and has a nonsensical scoring system. How can we have the most original articles but be second placed in that category?

[Deleted]

i dont think aveley fans tv can be deemed very credible especially posting a video of there coach using a racial slur against an opposing black player

[kris]

🤭